			40min:

HIGHLY EXCITED MOLECULAR STATES: QUANTUM DEFECT THEORY AND AB INITIO THEORY.

CH. JUNGEN, Laboratoire Aimé Cotton du CNRS, Université de Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay, France .

Full first principles calculations of highly excited complex structures and many-channel decay processes have been carried out in the past for atoms, usually by a combination of ab initio methods (e.g. R- matrix theory) with multichannel quantum defect theory (MQDT). A beautiful example is afforded by the work of Johnson et al.¹ on several rare gas atoms, where the first principles relativistic multichannel calculations were of such quality that they could be confronted directly with highly resolved experimental cross sections. Predictions of comparable completeness and accuracy are much rarer in the domain of molecular physics, because ab initio computations must be carried out and optimized for many nuclear geometries, and the nuclear (non-Born-Oppenheimer) dynamics greatly complicates the issue. In the present contribution molecular examples will be described where highly excited bound states have been calculated ab initio correctly on the scale of 1cm^-1 (CaF, n^ ast sim 15) and of 1MHz (H₂, n^ ast sim 55). The first of these examples² corresponds to a highly excited electron with principal quantum number n^ ast sim 15 which interacts with a rotating strongly dipolar ion core. In the second example ultra-high Rydberg states with n^ ast sim 55, situated 30cm^-1 below the ionization limit, have been excited and their hyperfine structure fully resolved.³ In the calculations account must be taken of the couplings between the excited electron inluding its spin, with the electronic and nuclear spins of the H₂⁺ ion core. The various steps and developments will be described which have been necessary to achieve such accuracy.

Some recent developments in the field of molecular R- matrix theory and the ab initio prediction of molecular wave packet motion will also be mentioned. \vskip 1cm

em(1) W. R. Johnson, K. T. Cheng. K.-N. Huang, and M. LeDourneuf, Phys. Rev. A 22, 989 (1980). em(2) C. M. Gittins, N. A. Harris, M. Hui, and R. W. Field, Can. J. Phys. 79, 247 (2001). em(3) A. Osterwalder, R. Seiler, and F. Merkt, J. Chem. Phys. 113, 7939 (2000).